Previous Page  49 / 514 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 514 Next Page
Page Background

Feride DOĞANER GÖNEL, Kasım EREN, Aslı ÖZGÜR AKTAY

n

38

Table 5:

Regression Results of the Standard Model

Variables

(1)

(2)

(3)

Pooled OLS

RE

FE

lnGDP exp

1.364***

0.879***

0.627***

[0.024]

[0.056]

[0.135]

lnGDP imp

1.070***

0.643 ***

0.890***

[0.031]

[0.103]

[0.286]

RTA

0.394***

0.203*

0.188

[0.067]

[0.147]

[0.154]

LnDist

-1.040 ***

-0.950***

[0.080]

[0.308]

Border

-1.702 ***

1.319***

[0.190]

[0.527]

Year1998

0.448***

-0.020

-0.068

[0.142]

[0.132]

[0.130]

Year2009

-0.625***

-0.182***

-0.112***

[0.115]

[0.036]

[0.2445]

R

2

0.73

0.90

0.90

Num. of. Observations

2106

2106

2106

Notes: Robust standard errors are in parenthesis. (***), (**), and (*) indicate %1,%5 and %10 significance

levels respectively.

According to the derived results, the estimated coefficients on GDP in all cases are significant at the 1% level and

have the expected sign. In other words the estimated coefficients on GDP-BBSCs elasticity of exports with respect

to GDP-EU15 countries are positive and significant which means economic size of EU-15 is important for BBSCs’

exports; if export will increase by 1% the GDP will increase by 0.627 and if import will increase by 1% the GDP

will increase by 0.890.

Naturally the distance term is only significant in pooled-OLS specification and the coefficient is negative as we

expected. From the pooled-OLS specification this result confirms the gravitational approach.

On the other hand, the CIS (here only Russia and Ukraine) countries were heavily impressed by the Russian Crisis

of 1998. So we used 1999 and 2008 time dummies to control for economic shocks. There isn’t any strong results

for 1998-crisis but the coefficient for other time-dummy (2009) is negative and significant. Table 7 presents the

time parameter estimates for three specifications. Another finding is that the RTAs have not led to an increase in

the share of trade of BBSCs vis-à-vis the EU-15.

4. Conclusion

This study examines BBSCs trade relations using baseline gravity model. It is expected that BBSCs establish close

trade relationship with the EU-15 countries which are economically stronger and also geographically closer.

Based on the data on trade flows between BBSCs and EU-15 countries, it is possible to say the basic gravity model

works well in this relationship. Positive sign of the GDP coefficients for both exporting and importing countries