Previous Page  14 / 514 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 514 Next Page
Page Background

Post-Communist Transition to Democracy and Problems in the Balkans: Case of Bosnia- Herzegovinia

3

n

which secures representation of those parts of the society in the common institutions 4) Finally there is a veto right

to protect the vital interests provided this social seg ments in the process of decision-making (Ljpard, 1991:494).

This approach believes that democracy transforms cleavages among social segments into constituent elements of

democracy by recognizing instead of eliminating or weakening them. Social segments are institutionalized as sep-

arate power structures and so transformed into main constituent elements of the political unit (Ljpard, 1991:42).

In other words, consociational democracy aitms at providing stability by the way of sharing power on the one

hand, but it also means the recognition of solid borders among the groups in divided societies.

Thus, consociational democracy model practiced in order to provide stability in BiH according to DAP estab-

lished a administrative and political structure that protected existing solid social cleavages. This structure has

became apparent in the definition of citizenship in BiH Constitutiton, in administrative and political territorial

arrangements (entities and cantons) and in the composition and functioning of state institutions.

1.1 Ethnizitation in Constitutional Order; Definition of Citizenship in the Constitution of Bosnia and

Herzegovina

The way how social segments are conceptualized by consitutions in divided societies has a critical significance

since it also indicates the pattern of collective identity and nation-building (Grewe and Reigner, 2011: 1-64). Con-

stitution of BiH neither includes a definition of a single nation-state nor mentions about protection of minorities.

The constitution defines three fighting ethnic groups (Bosniacs, Croats and Serbs) as constituent peoples and

citizens

.

The constitution defines citizenship in two different levels. One is common citizenship of BiH State. Sec-

ondly, two citizenships of two entities (Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovinia and Republika Sırpska) which consti-

tutes BiH State are mentioned. The constitution assigns the right to the entities to design their citizenships in their

own constitutions. Making use of this right the constitution of Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovinia define Bosniacs

and Serbs as constituent citizens while constitution of Republika Sırpska defines Republika Sırpska as the state of

the Serb people and all citizens.

1

That the ethnic groups (as constituent elements) is primarily emphasized while

citizenship is the subordinated to ethnicity in the definitions of both BiH common citizenship and entity citizen-

ship clearly expresses that the citizenship is perceived as the one derived from ethnic-religious root rather than

the individual itself. Such an expression both reflects and maintains the existing ethnic-religious fragmentation in

the society. Similarly, predominance of collective rights over individual rights have eroded human rights and also

consolidated ethnic-based political government (Grewe and Reigner, 1991:17-18).

On the other hand, institutional and territorial organization of the state in the axis of those three constituent peo-

ple have contributed to the political life to be ethnicized in both local and central level. Another significant point

is that the groups who are not defined as one of constituent peoples have not have the chance to be represented in

the decision-making process of the state.

1.2 Ethnizitation of Politics at the Local Level

;

Local Power Centers

The consociational model had a sound basis on the territorial organization corresponding to ethnic distribution

of Serb, Croat and Bosniac population. Accordingly, BiH has been defined as a sovereign state composed of two

highly autonomous entities. One of them is Republika Sırpska with Serb majority and the other is the Federation

of Bosnia-Herzegovinia with Bosniac and Croat majority. On the other hand, the Federation of Bosnia-Herzego-

vinia is divided into ten cantons which roughly corresponds to the distribution of Bosniac and Croat populations

in the Federation

2

. In this way, several local political powers in the levels of entities and cantons with their own

legislative, executive and judicial organs have emerged. Such an administrative and political division (separation)

based upon territory has entailed two considerable disadvantages for the consolidation of a multi-ethnic united

democracy in BiH. On the other hand, each constituent unit of the country can manage relations with the outside

World. This was also very much distant to the idea of creating a single country.

1 General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 14 December 1995, Annex 4, Constitution of BiH, Preamble, http://

www.ohr.int/dpa/default.asp?content id=379

2 General Framework Agreement, Annex, 4, Constitution of BiH, article 1,3